Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 22:04:25 GMT -5
ACivil Code would be equivalent to exceeding the limits of the investment. The fact that the first question which coincides with the other ground of appeal refers to art. para. does not refute this conclusion nor does it justify the extension of the reporting framework based on art. of the Civil Procedure Code. The two questions are related to two distinct legal issues with different premises fixing the content of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions in the form of art. from the date of entry into force of Law no. to which.
The first question refers is in fact placed in the context of the effect of the Country Email List amendment made by art. by Law no. on the application of art. para. not related to the repeal of art. by Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. Consequently the admissibility of the referral and in part the merits of the referral will be investigated separately for the two questions addressed to the High Court of Cassation and Justice without imposing at the same time the reformulation of the second question. On the admissibility of the referral to the High Court of pronouncement of a preliminary decision to resolve some legal issues . According to art. of the.
Code of Civil Procedure If during the trial a panel of the High Court of Cassation and Justice the court of appeal or the tribunal charged with resolving the case in the last instance finding that a question of law of whose clarification depends on the merits of the case in question is new and the High Court of Cassation and Justice has not ruled on it nor is it the subject of an appeal in the interest of the law being resolved it will be able to request the High Court of.
The first question refers is in fact placed in the context of the effect of the Country Email List amendment made by art. by Law no. on the application of art. para. not related to the repeal of art. by Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. Consequently the admissibility of the referral and in part the merits of the referral will be investigated separately for the two questions addressed to the High Court of Cassation and Justice without imposing at the same time the reformulation of the second question. On the admissibility of the referral to the High Court of pronouncement of a preliminary decision to resolve some legal issues . According to art. of the.
Code of Civil Procedure If during the trial a panel of the High Court of Cassation and Justice the court of appeal or the tribunal charged with resolving the case in the last instance finding that a question of law of whose clarification depends on the merits of the case in question is new and the High Court of Cassation and Justice has not ruled on it nor is it the subject of an appeal in the interest of the law being resolved it will be able to request the High Court of.